Strategic Progress Report 2016
Hungarian Higher Education 2016
Strategic progress report
Written by: József Berács, András Derényi, Péter Kádár-Csoboth, Gergely Kováts, István Polónyi, József Temesi
January, 2017
ISSN 2064-765468 pages
The publication can be downladed (in English) here.
Related documents
Content
- The strategic focuses of higher education: 2015-2016
- The economic context of the Hungarian higher education
- Changes in the institutional structure and management
- Admission trends in higher education
- Some characteristics of graduate employment
- Changes
in qualifications and study programmes; the development of teaching and
learning The models of dual education and its situation in Hungary
- Research performance in higher education
- Student mobility and foreign students in the Hungarian higher education
The
next edition of our strategic progress reports evaluates the priority
areas of the Hungarian higher education in relation to the developments
of the years of 2015 and 2016. Following the pattern of the previous
reports, the authors of the individual chapters will outline past trends
and potential future consequences in the context of the current events.
While in our last analysis we put certain areas into an international
context by presenting several detailed international comparisons , this
time we will primarily focus on the current situation in Hungary. Our
study is constituted by the material previously sent to the participants
of the “Hungarian Higher Education” conference held on 26 January 2017,
completed by the presentations of the speakers followed by a
discussion.
At the beginning of our report – in
accordance with our established routine –, we provide an overview of
the most important claims stated in the individual chapters. However,
the picture will only be complete with the figures and analyses
presented in the chapters. After the introductory chapter on educational
policy, our report touches upon three major areas. First we take a look
at the most recent developments of the institutional structure and
management as well as the economic conditions of the Hungarian higher
education. Wherever possible, we present the practices in place through
figures or surveys, contrasting them with government expectations. In
the next big block, we examine the situation on the national as well as
on the institutional level in light of the admission data and analyse
some figures in relation to graduate employment before moving on to the
detailed discussion of the issue of qualifications and learning and
teaching, including dual education. Finally, the analysis of domestic
and international data regarding researcher performance and student
mobility allow for international comparison.
Our
report intends to offer some claims for consideration for both
educational policy makers and heads of institutions. At the same time,
we have also tried to formulate our chapters in a way so as to make our
message comprehensible for a readership interested in, but less familiar
with higher education.
The year of 2017 –
as a pre-election year – will definitely have a few surprises up its
sleeve. According to one of the dimensions of our report, we look
forward to finding out whether the wide-ranging measures launched in
2015/2016 (which perhaps intervened somewhat excessively in the
functioning of the institutions) will be able to reverse the trends that
have been established over the years, influence seemingly entrenched
practices and bring the Hungarian higher education closer to the
international cutting edge. Although most of our authors are rather
sceptical or at least cautious in that respect, we still hope that at
our January 2018 conference and in the progress report to be published
then, we will be able to report about coherent examples of the results
of educational policy interventions.